In a twist to the ongoing legal battle involving music mogul Diddy, a gay adult film star known as Knockout has emerged, claiming that explicit photos submitted in a recent lawsuit against Diddy are misidentified and actually depict him, not the accused, Stevie J.

The lawsuit, filed by Rodney “Lil’ Rod” Jones, a former producer for Diddy, alleges sexual misconduct and names several high-profile industry figures as defendants. The document, aiming to substantiate claims of non-consensual sexual advances, included explicit images purportedly showing Stevie J in a compromising position.

However, the narrative took an unexpected turn when Knockout publicly declared on Twitter that the images in question feature him, not Stevie J, thus casting doubt on the evidence presented in the lawsuit. “This is not him it’s me yall really be trying it,” he stated, directly challenging the authenticity of the lawsuit’s claims.

Knockout’s bold intervention has stirred the pot, adding layers of complexity to an already convoluted legal dispute. His adamant stance and willingness to correct the record underscore the potential pitfalls of relying on digital evidence in highly charged legal battles.

Mr Jones provided screen grabs in his lawsuit of what he says is Stevie J allegedly penetrating a Caucasian male.

Jones’ lawsuit paints a sordid picture of life in Diddy’s inner circle, alleging repeated sexual assaults and forced exposure to explicit content as part of a broader pattern of misconduct. Among the most damning accusations is that Jones was coerced into watching a video of two men engaging in sexual acts, with one of the men falsely identified as Stevie J, according to Knockout’s recent claims.

Diddy’s legal team, led by attorney Shawn Holley, vehemently denies the allegations, dismissing them as fabrications aimed at sensationalizing the lawsuit. “We have overwhelming, indisputable proof that his claims are complete lies,” Holley stated, signaling a contentious legal battle ahead.

As the lawsuit progresses, the adult film star’s unexpected entry into the fray highlights the complexities of digital evidence and identity verification. With both sides entrenched in their positions, the court will ultimately determine the veracity of the claims and the implications for all involved.